What Quebec has is a government with a party that has campaigned on reducing the number of immigrants into Quebec to 40,000 (20%) in comparison with the nation's quota of 350,000+, a party that has campaigned on banning burkas, hijabs, and kippas, a party that has campaigned on the ethnic heritage of the Quebecois, and a party that explicitly identifies as "Nationalist" before "Conservative". So what was key to the success of the CAQ?
Currently, on the world stage, we are seeing tensions in Venezuela over Juan Guaidó staging a potential US or Brazilian-backed coup against Maduro, tensions in Iran over the renegotiating of the Iran deal, tensions in Syria over Israel occupying the Golan Heights, and now the tensions between China are increasing even more than before. As if we didn’t have Chinese expansion in the South China Sea to worry about, as if we didn’t have North Korea (a Chinese proxy's missile tests) to worry about, and, as if we didn’t have the current trade war and deficit to worry about––we are now seeing the Canadian government take explicit actions against one of China’s major international brands. The biggest issue about all of this is that all of these nation-states that the US is taking action against are nation-state that are aligned with one another (plus Russia).
So these are the Liberals of today... What should be noted here isn't that the Conservatives are a better option, but that the Liberals are just as bad. If anything, Canadian Nationalists should be hopeful for the rise of a paradigm characterized by the NDP and PPC rather than the Progressive Neoliberalism of today, especially because the Economic Nationalism of the NDP greatly compliments the more National Conservatism of the PPC. It is within a paradigm like this, that there is a lot of populist potential for anyone who finds the point of compromise between Socialist Populism and Nationalist Populism.
If the Liberals had a single ounce of competence in their body or a single shred of dignity in their bones, they would put a motion of no-confidence forward against Trudeau and they would bring Wilson-Raybould to the forefront of their party, possibly even having her run for Prime Minister in the upcoming election. If Wilson-Raybould was as intelligent as she is ethical, she would use this current scandal as leverage to try to run as a PM candidate for the NDP, thereby furthering the inevitably death of the liberals to the Left-Populism of the NDP. Frankly, one should have little confidence that any of these plays will be made.
Justin Trudeau is the worst Prime Minister in Canadian history. Since his election in 2015, Justin Trudeau has done absolutely nothing for the average Canadian family. Instead, what his Liberal Government have done is systematically introduced new forms of taxation on the already-overburdened Canadian people in an attempt to erase the middle class and create a communist-style dictatorship. Aided by a blatantly false media narrative, it seems there is nothing
There is a growing alternative movement on the Right in Canada, but... there is much division within this movement. The Right is walking a tightrope between more radical elements and more centrist elements or more implicit elements and more explicit elements. Within this dynamic, the Right must learn how to balance itself. This balancing act must have four parts.
The situation in South Africa largely parallels the situation in Rhodesia, or what is now Zimbabwe, only a few decades earlier. Former Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe, who has recently resigned upon being faced with impeachment proceedings, was known for inciting violence against white farmers while also forcibly confiscating their land. This ended up driving the whites out of Zimbabwe. With this being said, it was only a few years ago that Mugabe’s government started to ask white farmers to return, as the agricultural export industry had collapsed upon their departure.
COMER’s most recent appeal for a trial in the Supreme Court of Canada was dismissed. Previously, COMER’s case was shut down on the grounds that Mackenzie King’s expressed intention wasn’t explicit in the preamble of the BOC Act, despite being highly implicit and clearly intended when he nationalized the bank. It is beginning to look like the only way we will see real change in our banking system is on an executive or legislative level as opposed to a judicial one.