There is a growing alternative movement on the Right in Canada, but... there is much division within this movement. The Right is walking a tightrope between more radical elements and more centrist elements or more implicit elements and more explicit elements. Within this dynamic, the Right must learn how to balance itself. This balancing act must have four parts.

To access this post, you must purchase Subscription.

COMER’s most recent appeal for a trial in the Supreme Court of Canada was dismissed. Previously, COMER’s case was shut down on the grounds that Mackenzie King’s expressed intention wasn’t explicit in the preamble of the BOC Act, despite being highly implicit and clearly intended when he nationalized the bank. It is beginning to look like the only way we will see real change in our banking system is on an executive or legislative level as opposed to a judicial one.

Acknowledging the past marginalization of the Jewish peoples throughout history, it must be acknowledged that the Jewish peoples aren’t the only one’s to have suffered their fair share of victimization. Every peoples have conquered and been conquered, and this is what often sets the stage for their existence in the modern world.

So long as a hierarchical collective, with a strong in-group and low-time preference, stays disciplined, regimented, composed, and consolidated, then Golden Ages will last.

Canada is in a position where it is going to need to start to consider an alternative model of self sufficiency in light of imposing reciprocal tariffs on U.S. imports.

One cannot help but get off the bandwagon where Technocracy meets Neoliberalism and Progressivism–– namely, under the merger of the Transnational with the Transracial, and the Transracial with the Transexual, ultimately in order to facilitate a kind of Transhumanism. In such a model, the kind of wealth distribution generated by any technological innovation is directed towards the increasing populations of victimized minorities, who collectively serve as a kind of model for the sort of human that the Progressive Technocrats want to selectively breed.

Canada needs a Populist alternative to the Progressive Conservatives, lest the side of excessive social progress upheave our political institutions and turn our culture into a war of social justice warriors seeking to claim the throne of political correctness. Canada needs an outlet to address the Populist sentiments of the labour left and the white working class majority, while also maintaining the social conservatism and traditional culture of the past millennium— traditional culture that was characterized by monocultural homogeneity and monogamous heterosexuality.

With Justin, we must not forget that this is the man who has racked up an enormous federal deficit. This is the man who wants to open borders, increase mass immigration, and go "post-national". This is the man whose regime has tried to pass laws like Motion 103 (which prohibits criticism of Islam), Bill 89 (which allows the government to take children away), and Bill C-16 (which introduces mandated speech with “proper pronouns”). This is the man who non-penetrative bestiality has been made legal under by the supreme court. This is the man who wants to lower the age for sodomy. This is the man who tried to get rid of Friday sittings and remove accountability for his actions from Parliamentary dialogue, and it’s not hard to see why.

I am convinced the only way any kind of Nationalist movement will get ahead is through the merger of Labour-Left style Socialist-Populism with Populist-Right style Economic Nationalism. Candidates like Sanders (who at one point advocated against mass immigration) and Corbyn (who stands against Israel and who favours Nationalization) need to merge with leaders like Orban (who advocates for economic nationalism and social conservatism) and Trump (who advocates for economic and civic nationalism). In terms of Canadian politics, this would look like a NDP-Conservative coalition, or it would look like a Nationalist option that facilitates this political demand.

It was under Progressive Conservatives like Diefenbaker that we moved away from a policy of ethnic homogeneity to a “points system”, only to entrench the rights of foreigners in the adoption of the Bill of Rights; and it was under Progressive Liberals like Pierre Elliot Trudeau that we adopted radical immigration policy and signed the United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, only to entrench the rights of foreigners in the adoption of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. After all, it was under Pierre Elliot Trudeau that eventually, in 1976, 1978, and 1988, we adopted immigration policies that were explicitly meant to encourage multiculturalism (such as the Multicultural Act of '88), mass immigration (such as the immigration policies of '76, and '78), and ultimately, we adopted an immigration policy that explicitly went against what was required to create a society that could afford to let immigrants in to begin with.